School Attendance Codes Explained, From I to U
Only four codes count as unauthorised absence. What each code means, which ones are taken out...

In England in 2026, 8.1% of infant class size appeals heard by a panel were upheld: 387 out of 4,757. Other primary school appeals succeeded 26.4% of the time, and 47 councils had no infant class appeal succeed at all. A panel can only uphold one on three narrow grounds, and how much your child needs the school is not one of them.
If your child has been refused a Reception, Year 1 or Year 2 place because the class is full, the appeal you are facing is not an ordinary school appeal. It is decided under a separate and much narrower test, and the national figures show it. This page sets out the numbers for every council in England, the three grounds a panel can use, and who counts as an exception to the 30 pupil limit.
Starting home education? You do not have to work it out from scratch.
Everything in one place, written for the law as it stands in 2026: the legal foundation, ready-to-send deregistration and local-authority letters, printable weekly and term planners, a curriculum guide by subject, and record-keeping logs. The letters and planners, done for you.
Get the System for £49 →8.1% nationally in 2026. Families lodged 7,671 infant class size appeals, equal to 1.3% of the 604,007 admissions to infant classes. 4,757 of those, 62%, were heard by a panel, and 387 were upheld. The DfE measures success as a share of appeals heard, so an appeal withdrawn before the hearing is not counted as a loss.
Everything you need before you begin home educating in the UK: your legal rights, a deregistration letter template, and a calm first-week plan. Free printable.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click. We never share your email.
That is well below every other kind of school appeal. Secondary appeals succeeded 19.5% of the time. Infant class appeals are counted inside the DfE’s primary figures, so taking them out shows that the other primary appeals succeeded 26.4% of the time: 759 of 2,870 heard. That comparison is our calculation from the DfE tables.
An infant class is one containing Reception, Year 1 or Year 2 pupils. Regulation 4 of the 2012 regulations, made under section 1 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, says no infant class may contain more than 30 pupils while an ordinary teaching session is conducted by a single school teacher, or 30 per teacher where there are more.
It becomes an infant class size appeal when the admission authority refused the place because admitting another child would breach that limit, and there were no measures it could take to avoid that without prejudicing efficient education or the efficient use of resources (Appeals Code paragraph 4.2). If your child was refused for any other reason, the panel uses the ordinary two stage process instead, which is where most successful appeals come from.
A school that admits fewer than 30 children a year can still face infant class size appeals. The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman gives the example of a school admitting 20 a year but teaching Reception, Year 1 and Year 2 in two classes of 30.
Under paragraph 4.6 of the School Admission Appeals Code, the panel may only uphold the appeal where:
Paragraph 4.8 says the panel must dismiss the appeal where the arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, or a mistake would not have changed the outcome, and the refusal was one a reasonable admission authority could have made. Where several appeals succeed on these grounds but admitting them all would seriously prejudice efficient education or the efficient use of resources, the panel moves to a second stage and compares the cases (paragraphs 4.7 and 4.9).
Admission authorities must tell parents about these limited circumstances before they decide whether to appeal (paragraph 4.12).
Very high. Paragraph 4.10 of the Code says the panel must be satisfied that the refusal was “perverse in the light of the admission arrangements”, meaning beyond the range of responses open to a reasonable decision maker. The Ombudsman says that a refusal which makes the school run or keeping a job impossible is very unlikely to meet that bar, and that it does not usually uphold complaints that a panel should have found a refusal perverse.
The Ombudsman’s fact sheet gives examples of the kind of mistake that can lead a panel to uphold an appeal:
So the useful evidence is the detail of how your application was ranked: which oversubscription criterion your child was placed under, the distance used, and where the last place offered fell. Compare that with the school’s published admission arrangements.
Some children can be admitted to an infant class without counting towards the 30 pupil limit. The Schedule to the 2012 regulations lists them. In summary:
A child only counts as excepted where they could not be given suitable education in an infant class at the school without measures that would prejudice efficient education or the efficient use of resources (regulation 5).
Every panel applies the same legal test, so a low figure is not evidence of an unfair panel and a high one is not a promise. With that said, the regional spread is wide.
| Region | Lodged | Heard | Upheld | Success rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North East | 247 | 178 | 30 | 16.9% |
| Yorkshire and The Humber | 912 | 560 | 83 | 14.8% |
| South West | 310 | 185 | 18 | 9.7% |
| North West | 1,402 | 901 | 80 | 8.9% |
| East of England | 805 | 497 | 40 | 8.0% |
| East Midlands | 692 | 422 | 28 | 6.6% |
| West Midlands | 878 | 526 | 33 | 6.3% |
| South East | 1,362 | 803 | 50 | 6.2% |
| Outer London | 666 | 410 | 16 | 3.9% |
| Inner London | 397 | 275 | 9 | 3.3% |
Of the 118 councils where at least 10 infant class appeals were heard, the middle figure was 5.1%, and 42 were above the national 8.1%. 47 councils had no infant class appeal succeed, 30 of them after hearing 10 or more. Small numbers swing percentages, so a council that heard a handful is marked with an asterisk. Each council name links to its full appeals page, with secondary and primary figures and the trend.
| Council | Lodged | Heard | Upheld | Success rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barking and Dagenham | 109 | 43 | 1 | 2.3% |
| Barnet | 37 | 26 | 1 | 3.8% |
| Barnsley | 43 | 37 | 7 | 18.9% |
| Bath and North East Somerset | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Bedford | 12 | 5 | 1 | 20.0%* |
| Bexley | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Birmingham | 157 | 97 | 4 | 4.1% |
| Blackburn with Darwen | 46 | 39 | 3 | 7.7% |
| Blackpool | 25 | 11 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bolton | 72 | 52 | 1 | 1.9% |
| Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | 34 | 19 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bracknell Forest | 10 | 8 | 2 | 25.0%* |
| Bradford | 91 | 50 | 5 | 10.0% |
| Brent | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Brighton and Hove | 45 | 19 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bristol, City of | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Bromley | 23 | 13 | 1 | 7.7% |
| Buckinghamshire | 58 | 25 | 1 | 4.0% |
| Bury | 31 | 22 | 1 | 4.5% |
| Calderdale | 40 | 17 | 2 | 11.8% |
| Cambridgeshire | 107 | 64 | 12 | 18.8% |
| Camden | 23 | 10 | 3 | 30.0% |
| Central Bedfordshire | 71 | 38 | 5 | 13.2% |
| Cheshire East | 37 | 20 | 1 | 5.0% |
| Cheshire West and Chester | 37 | 25 | 1 | 4.0% |
| City of London | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Cornwall | 21 | 12 | 0 | 0.0% |
| County Durham | 22 | 13 | 4 | 30.8% |
| Coventry | 112 | 68 | 6 | 8.8% |
| Croydon | 51 | 25 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Cumberland | 9 | 5 | 2 | 40.0%* |
| Darlington | 6 | 6 | 1 | 16.7%* |
| Derby | 43 | 31 | 5 | 16.1% |
| Derbyshire | 105 | 70 | 1 | 1.4% |
| Devon | 29 | 13 | 3 | 23.1% |
| Doncaster | 66 | 33 | 7 | 21.2% |
| Dorset | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Dudley | 57 | 23 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ealing | 69 | 52 | 1 | 1.9% |
| East Riding of Yorkshire | 58 | 37 | 3 | 8.1% |
| East Sussex | 77 | 40 | 1 | 2.5% |
| Enfield | 23 | 11 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Essex | 241 | 161 | 10 | 6.2% |
| Gateshead | 26 | 24 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Gloucestershire | 62 | 44 | 11 | 25.0% |
| Greenwich | 39 | 20 | 1 | 5.0% |
| Hackney | 31 | 28 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Halton | 3 | 3 | 1 | 33.3%* |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Hampshire | 188 | 116 | 3 | 2.6% |
| Haringey | 49 | 30 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Harrow | 18 | 15 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hartlepool | 10 | 10 | 3 | 30.0% |
| Havering | 71 | 58 | 1 | 1.7% |
| Herefordshire, County of | 8 | 7 | 3 | 42.9%* |
| Hertfordshire | 185 | 92 | 5 | 5.4% |
| Hillingdon | 27 | 19 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hounslow | 25 | 19 | 2 | 10.5% |
| Isle of Wight | 27 | 8 | 1 | 12.5%* |
| Isles of Scilly | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Islington | 29 | 9 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Kent | 152 | 111 | 2 | 1.8% |
| Kingston upon Hull, City of | 79 | 44 | 11 | 25.0% |
| Kingston upon Thames | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Kirklees | 117 | 76 | 9 | 11.8% |
| Knowsley | 49 | 31 | 3 | 9.7% |
| Lambeth | 80 | 42 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Lancashire | 221 | 119 | 22 | 18.5% |
| Leeds | 113 | 65 | 3 | 4.6% |
| Leicester | 61 | 44 | 3 | 6.8% |
| Leicestershire | 106 | 60 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Lewisham | 12 | 11 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Lincolnshire | 61 | 33 | 8 | 24.2% |
| Liverpool | 154 | 77 | 4 | 5.2% |
| Luton | 71 | 53 | 1 | 1.9% |
| Manchester | 61 | 25 | 1 | 4.0% |
| Medway | 31 | 22 | 9 | 40.9% |
| Merton | 30 | 4 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Middlesbrough | 20 | 7 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Milton Keynes | 22 | 21 | 5 | 23.8% |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 19 | 13 | 4 | 30.8% |
| Newham | 80 | 70 | 2 | 2.9% |
| Norfolk | 27 | 20 | 0 | 0.0% |
| North East Lincolnshire | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| North Lincolnshire | 5 | 3 | 1 | 33.3%* |
| North Northamptonshire | 49 | 35 | 0 | 0.0% |
| North Somerset | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| North Tyneside | 45 | 26 | 1 | 3.8% |
| North Yorkshire | 65 | 42 | 9 | 21.4% |
| Northumberland | 3 | 3 | 3 | 100.0%* |
| Nottingham | 145 | 74 | 5 | 6.8% |
| Nottinghamshire | 99 | 62 | 4 | 6.5% |
| Oldham | 80 | 64 | 3 | 4.7% |
| Oxfordshire | 87 | 55 | 6 | 10.9% |
| Peterborough | 35 | 20 | 5 | 25.0% |
| Plymouth | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Portsmouth | 32 | 19 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Reading | 38 | 20 | 1 | 5.0% |
| Redbridge | 71 | 49 | 4 | 8.2% |
| Redcar and Cleveland | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Richmond upon Thames | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Rochdale | 92 | 66 | 2 | 3.0% |
| Rotherham | 55 | 44 | 8 | 18.2% |
| Rutland | 1 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Salford | 63 | 45 | 3 | 6.7% |
| Sandwell | 78 | 55 | 1 | 1.8% |
| Sefton | 85 | 56 | 7 | 12.5% |
| Sheffield | 71 | 52 | 8 | 15.4% |
| Shropshire | 39 | 7 | 1 | 14.3%* |
| Slough | 185 | 79 | 12 | 15.2% |
| Solihull | 13 | 11 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Somerset | 58 | 32 | 0 | 0.0% |
| South Gloucestershire | 21 | 14 | 1 | 7.1% |
| South Tyneside | 47 | 39 | 8 | 20.5% |
| Southampton | 16 | 12 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Southend-on-Sea | 19 | 10 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Southwark | 8 | 8 | 3 | 37.5%* |
| St. Helens | 29 | 25 | 1 | 4.0% |
| Staffordshire | 65 | 37 | 3 | 8.1% |
| Stockport | 46 | 28 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Stockton-on-Tees | 21 | 16 | 2 | 12.5% |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 19 | 14 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Suffolk | 20 | 18 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sunderland | 23 | 17 | 4 | 23.5% |
| Surrey | 121 | 84 | 2 | 2.4% |
| Sutton | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Swindon | 22 | 16 | 1 | 6.3% |
| Tameside | 38 | 31 | 9 | 29.0% |
| Telford and Wrekin | 40 | 20 | 3 | 15.0% |
| Thurrock | 17 | 16 | 1 | 6.3% |
| Torbay | 2 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Tower Hamlets | 25 | 23 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Trafford | 39 | 30 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Wakefield | 102 | 57 | 9 | 15.8% |
| Walsall | 40 | 26 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Waltham Forest | 40 | 31 | 4 | 12.9% |
| Wandsworth | 46 | 31 | 1 | 3.2% |
| Warrington | 20 | 14 | 3 | 21.4% |
| Warwickshire | 129 | 78 | 5 | 6.4% |
| West Berkshire | 13 | 6 | 3 | 50.0%* |
| West Northamptonshire | 22 | 13 | 2 | 15.4% |
| West Sussex | 209 | 122 | 1 | 0.8% |
| Westminster | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Westmorland and Furness | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.0%* |
| Wigan | 113 | 84 | 10 | 11.9% |
| Wiltshire | 26 | 14 | 2 | 14.3% |
| Windsor and Maidenhead | 30 | 22 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Wirral | 49 | 26 | 2 | 7.7% |
| Wokingham | 21 | 14 | 1 | 7.1% |
| Wolverhampton | 107 | 72 | 2 | 2.8% |
| Worcestershire | 14 | 11 | 5 | 45.5% |
| York | 7 | 3 | 1 | 33.3%* |
The full dataset is available as JSON at /data/school-appeals-by-council.json, and every council is compared across all phases on our school appeal success rate by council page.
You have the right to appeal, and the decision is yours. The honest position from the figures is that where a class is genuinely full and the admission arrangements were applied correctly, a panel has very little room to uphold an appeal. Where you can point to a specific mistake that would have changed the outcome, it is a different prospect.
In England in 2026, 8.1% of infant class size appeals heard by a panel were upheld, 387 of 4,757. That compares with 26.4% for other primary appeals and 19.5% for secondary appeals. Figures are from the DfE’s Admission appeals in England, reporting year 2026.
Yes, but only on three grounds under paragraph 4.6 of the School Admission Appeals Code: admitting another child would not breach the 30 pupil limit, the admission arrangements were unlawful or wrongly applied and your child would otherwise have got a place, or the refusal was not one a reasonable admission authority would have made.
Only if the school’s published admission arrangements give siblings priority and that was not applied correctly, so your child would otherwise have been offered a place. Having a sibling there is not a ground on its own.
A twin or other child from a multiple birth can be an excepted pupil where a sibling from the same birth is admitted normally, under the Schedule to the School Admissions (Infant Class Sizes) (England) Regulations 2012. They only count as excepted where they could not otherwise be given suitable education in the class without measures that would prejudice efficient education or the efficient use of resources.
47 councils in England had no infant class size appeal upheld in 2026, and 30 of those had heard 10 or more. Every council’s figure is in the table on this page.
At least 20 school days from the date you were told the application was unsuccessful, under paragraph 2.1a of the School Admission Appeals Code. The admission authority sets the exact deadline and must publish its appeals timetable by 28 February each year.
This is information, not legal advice
Darling Mellow is a parenting website. We are not solicitors, we are not regulated to give legal advice, and nothing here is advice about your particular child or situation. We write about the law in England, we date everything and we link our sources so you can check them. Deadlines and duties change, and only you know your full circumstances, so please take proper advice before making a decision that matters.
Where to get free or regulated advice
If you are in Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland, the law and the services differ and you should use your own nation’s guidance.
Real talk from real UK mums. Ask questions, share advice, find local groups near you.
Join the Community →Ready to make a start, the calm way?
Everything in one place, written for the law as it stands in 2026: the legal foundation, ready-to-send deregistration and local-authority letters, printable weekly and term planners, a curriculum guide by subject, and record-keeping logs. The letters and planners, done for you.
Get the System for £49 →Found this helpful? Take the next step ↓
Your legal rights, a deregistration letter template, and a calm first-week plan.
Download it free →Everything to start home educating in the UK, the legal startup kit, deregistration and LA letters, curriculum options and a weekly planner, in one system.
Get it - £49 →Pop in your email and we will send the starter checklist straight away: the legal basics, how to deregister, and a calm first week. Plus one short email a week with new guides, free tools, and what is changing in the law. No spam, ever.
Free forever · Unsubscribe in one click · We never share your email
Everything you need before you begin home educating in the UK: your legal rights, a deregistration letter template, and a calm first-week plan. Free printable.
Join 2,400+ UK mums on The Mellow Post. Unsubscribe any time.